![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I am not bothered by immortal!Doctor, for several reasons:
- It's Sarah Jane Adventures, which I don't entirely buy as canonical.
- It may not be explicitly stated, from the wording of Guardian's article.
- How many times has Doctor Who contradicted itself in terms of canon rules? ABOUT TEN MILLION.
- GEEKY ALERT: As someone notes in the Guardian comments, the twelve regeneration limit was a Time Lord imposition and artificial. None of their governance, no limit.
All I can say is that I've learned to roll with the punches; paradigms in this fandom shift regularly without a clutch. It'll be okay.
- It's Sarah Jane Adventures, which I don't entirely buy as canonical.
- It may not be explicitly stated, from the wording of Guardian's article.
- How many times has Doctor Who contradicted itself in terms of canon rules? ABOUT TEN MILLION.
- GEEKY ALERT: As someone notes in the Guardian comments, the twelve regeneration limit was a Time Lord imposition and artificial. None of their governance, no limit.
All I can say is that I've learned to roll with the punches; paradigms in this fandom shift regularly without a clutch. It'll be okay.
