Rhi. (
rhivolution) wrote2010-11-11 08:37 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
this is why we can't have nice things...
Per
taraljc, Rubicon has been cancelled. Yes, in light of renewing The Walking Dead after two.episodes.
Sigh. Yes, I know, #firstworldproblem, niche programme, but I enjoyed that show. It was the US answer to early Spooks*--thoughtful, dangerous, intelligence agency drama, and a slow burner.
...which was probably why they tossed it. The US viewing public has no patience for slow burners.** Their loss.
* Should that remake happen, and I have no idea how it would be done (as the FBI is incredibly different culturally, and we have also had about ten million FBI shows), I will cry.
** Please tell me we are grown-up enough to know that I don't necessarily mean You Specifically when I say 'the US viewing public'. There IS a dominant sociocultural construct of television viewers, both perceived and actual, in every country, though.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Sigh. Yes, I know, #firstworldproblem, niche programme, but I enjoyed that show. It was the US answer to early Spooks*--thoughtful, dangerous, intelligence agency drama, and a slow burner.
...which was probably why they tossed it. The US viewing public has no patience for slow burners.** Their loss.
* Should that remake happen, and I have no idea how it would be done (as the FBI is incredibly different culturally, and we have also had about ten million FBI shows), I will cry.
** Please tell me we are grown-up enough to know that I don't necessarily mean You Specifically when I say 'the US viewing public'. There IS a dominant sociocultural construct of television viewers, both perceived and actual, in every country, though.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I also wanted to mention that making derisive comments about the American viewing public is kind of insulting even when you clarify that you're not speaking about me, personally. If you have to add a footnote to explain why it shouldn't be insulting, maybe you ought to consider phrasing it differently in the first place.
no subject
no subject
ETA: That's fair, but ultimately I don't think the footnote helped. If anything, it seemed kind of condescending, like I should obviously know that even though you're talking about a group I am a part of, you're not speaking about me, personally. Which doesn't quite work.
no subject
But I sounded wanky (still sound wanky?) and I do apologize.
no subject